Entrepreneur Factory

A recent TechCrunch blog entry asked “Can Entrepreneurs Be Made?”    The piece is a great summary of recent research in this field.  It’s also generated a lot of useful and fascinating discussions.

Most research indicates entrepreneurs are made.   How entrepreneurs are made is much less certain. 

I’ve given it some thought and believe most people (if not everyone) has the potential to become an entrepreneur.   That said, I don’t think there is a cookie-cutter factory method for making entrepreneurs.  Furthermore, without a large shift in our society, I doubt entrepreneurs can be mass produced.      

It’s a fanciful analogy, but I suspect entrepreneurs are Sleeping Beauties waiting to be waken by the right combination of factors (which probably don’t include any princes or kisses).   I suspect these “factors” are universal, but that the degree of intensity for each factor is unique to each potential entrepreneur. 

The No Idea Factory inspires entrepreneurs everywhere – and causes others to dream of an entrepreneur factory,

Image Citation

Entrepreneurs – Part 2

On January 7th I posted some thoughts on what qualifies someone for the “entrepreneur” label.  I still don’t have a firm definition, but I wanted to share a couple of opinions which have recently influenced my thoughts on this matter. 

First, two fellows I met at Awesome Camp in Lincoln on January 30th are very certain that someone can be entrepreneurial without being an entrepreneur.  If I understood them correctly (and I confess it was the end of an exciting day at the end of a tiring week) there must be several livelihoods dependant on the endeavor for someone to qualify as an entrepreneur.  To cite my earlier example, by these definitions my friend’s Lego operation is entrepreneurial, but doesn’t qualify her as an entrepreneur. 

This makes sense to me, but I find it unsatisfactory.  I think more words might be needed. 

In the meantime, I received an email today with a link to Hugh MacLeod’s new prints related to Seth Godin’s latest book, Linchpin.  In Linchpin: Are You Indispensable, Godin has a different definition of artist than Rocco Landesman, the NEA Chairman I quoted in my January 7th post.  Both Landesman and Godin believe artists are entrepreneurs. 

I’m going to quote MacLeod’s website directly, because I can’t say it any better than he has:  By Seth’s definition, an artist is not just some person who messes around with paint and brushes, an artist is somebody who does (and I LOVE this term) “emotional work.”  Work that you put your heart and soul into. Work that matters. Work that you gladly sacrifice all other alternatives for. As a working artist and cartoonist myself, I know exactly what he means. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it. – end quote

The idea that people doing “emotional work” are entrepreneurs resonates with me.  However, I have great respect for the two business men I met and their belief that entrepreneurial activities do not qualify one as an entrepreneur. 

I’m wondering if the words and definitions would line up to everyone’s satisfaction if we made a distinction between “entrepreneurs” (those with emotional work and/or entrepreneurial activities) and “business entrepreneurs” (those with livelihoods depending on their endeavor). 

Check out the rest of MacLeod’s prints here or order his book, Ignore Everybody: And 39 Other Keys to Creativity, here

Read reviews or order a copy of Godin’s book, Linchpin, here.    

By the way, isn’t it fun to see how one creative work inspires another?  How creative are you feeling today?  Do you think we have any obligation to share our creativity with others?  Who inspires you to be creative?  Can you spend more time with them or their work?  Can you do it today?

Below is one of Hugh MacLeod’s prints inspired by Seth Godin’s Linchpin. 

Image Citation

Who are Entrepreneurs?

Who are Entrepreneurs?

This week the new Chairman of the National Endowments for the Arts (NEA), Rocco Landesman, referred to artists as entrepreneurs on the PBS News Hour.  The message is part of his “Art Works” tour.  I believe he’s right and it got me thinking about how exactly I define entrepreneurship and who qualifies for the moniker. 

 The only conclusion I’ve reached so far is that a lot more people are entrepreneurs than realize it or will admit to it. 

For example, a friend buys Legos from individuals on-line (the big boxes of “left-overs” every home has), matches the individual pieces from multiple bulk purchases with the building instructions she downloads from Lego’s website, has her two sons put together the newly compiled kits, photographs the completed kits and sells them on-line.

In her mind this system she’s devised is just a little hobby that enables her sons to put together as many Lego kits as they want.  From her perspective this “hobby” is not important, elaborate or creative enough to be labeled “entrepreneurial.”  But I think she’s wrong and I believe there are a lot of people out there just like her. 

What would happen if these entrepreneurs realized who they were?  Why is this behavior so difficult for us to acknowledge?  What can we do to encourage and celebrate these entrepreneurial endeavors?

To read more about the message of the Art Works Tour, check out: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/blog/

To watch the PBS New Hour interview that started this thought process, go to:  http://www.pbs.org/newshour/art/blog/